The Answer Index · National 100 · All Practice Areas · August 2026
AI visibility results for 100 eligible law firms.
We asked ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews 300 real client questions. 1,200 answers, measured monthly. These are AI visibility results for 100 eligible firms.
Rankings are never for sale. Client firms are always disclosed. Corrections within 48 hours.
Is your firm on the list?
Get your firm's full report free. The 300 answers, your share of voice, and the three fastest fixes.
It is the same measurement our clients pay for every month. Yours is free.
All 100 eligible firms received at least one measured mention this edition.
The top 10 firms take 40.4% of every AI mention. The other 90 eligible firms split 59.6%.
Only 35 of 100 eligible firms appear in all four engines. 12 firms appear in a single engine.
Lerner and Rowe earns an estimated 130.0K organic visits a month and ranks #43 in AI answers. Search authority is not transferring.
Morgan & Morgan holds the top spot with 8.4% share of voice. The other 99 ranked firms split the rest.
Morgan & Morgan holds the top spot with a single-digit share of voice. Nine tenths of AI mentions in this market still name someone else.
The Ranking
Top 10 this edition
- 1Morgan & Morgan8.4%42.7%
●
- 2Gair, Gair, Conason5.9%31.3%
●
- 3Cellino Law4.1%26.0%
●
- 4Salvi, Schostok & Pritchard3.8%24.3%
●
- 5The Barnes Firm3.5%22.7%
●
- 6Thomas J. Henry Law3.3%21.3%
●
- 7Alexander Shunnarah3.1%20.0%
●
- 8Rosenbaum & Associates2.9%19.0%
●
- 9Sweet James2.8%18.3%
●
- 10Pintas & Mullins2.6%17.3%
●
Complete Data
Full board, 100 eligible firms
AI share of voice: this firm's share of every firm mention across all 1,200 answers. Appearance rate: the share of 300 tracked questions where this firm shows up at least once.
| Firm | Engines | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ● | Morgan & Morgan MRGN DR 91 · 2.4M organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 8.4% | 42.7% | 91 | 2.4M | |
| 2 | ● | Gair, Gair, Conason GAIR DR 82 · 41.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 5.9% | 31.3% | 82 | 41.0K | |
| 3 | ● | Cellino Law CELL DR 74 · 68.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 4.1% | 26.0% | 74 | 68.0K | |
| 4 | ● | Salvi, Schostok & Pritchard SALV DR 78 · 33.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 3.8% | 24.3% | 78 | 33.0K | |
| 5 | ● | The Barnes Firm BRNS DR 71 · 95.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 3.5% | 22.7% | 71 | 95.0K | |
| 6 | ● | Thomas J. Henry Law TJHL DR 76 · 210.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 3.3% | 21.3% | 76 | 210.0K | |
| 7 | ● | Alexander Shunnarah SHUN DR 69 · 180.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 3.1% | 20.0% | 69 | 180.0K | |
| 8 | ● | Rosenbaum & Associates ROSN DR 72 · 27.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 2.9% | 19.0% | 72 | 27.0K | |
| 9 | ● | Sweet James SWJM DR 75 · 150.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 2.8% | 18.3% | 75 | 150.0K | |
| 10 | ● | Pintas & Mullins PINT DR 73 · 48.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 2.6% | 17.3% | 73 | 48.0K | |
| 11 | ● | Ask4SAM ASK4Client DR 68 · 38.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 2.5% | 17.0% | 68 | 38.0K | |
| 12 | ● | Levin Papantonio LEVP DR 79 · 52.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 2.4% | 16.7% | 79 | 52.0K | |
| 13 | ● | Simmons Hanly Conroy SIMM DR 77 · 88.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 2.3% | 16.3% | 77 | 88.0K | |
| 14 | ● | Weitz & Luxenberg WEIT DR 80 · 64.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 2.2% | 16.0% | 80 | 64.0K | |
| 15 | ● | Keller & Keller KELL DR 70 · 58.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 2.1% | 15.3% | 70 | 58.0K | |
| 16 | ● | Jacoby & Meyers JACO DR 74 · 120.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 2.0% | 15.0% | 74 | 120.0K | |
| 17 | ● | Wilshire Law Firm WILS DR 72 · 105.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 1.9% | 14.7% | 72 | 105.0K | |
| 18 | ● | Lanier Law Firm LANI DR 76 · 31.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 1.8% | 14.3% | 76 | 31.0K | |
| 19 | ● | Cohen & Jaffe COHN DR 66 · 22.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 1.7% | 14.0% | 66 | 22.0K | |
| 20 | ● | Block O’Toole & Murphy BLOT DR 75 · 29.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 1.6% | 13.7% | 75 | 29.0K | |
| 21 | ● | Panish Shea Ravipudi PANR DR 77 · 25.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 1.6% | 13.3% | 77 | 25.0K | |
| 22 | ● | Hagens Berman HAGE DR 78 · 44.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 1.5% | 13.0% | 78 | 44.0K | |
| 23 | ● | Robbins Geller ROBB DR 81 · 39.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 1.5% | 12.7% | 81 | 39.0K | |
| 24 | ● | Labaton Keller Sucharow LABA DR 79 · 21.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 1.4% | 12.3% | 79 | 21.0K | |
| 25 | ● | Bernstein Liebhard BERN DR 72 · 18.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 1.4% | 12.0% | 72 | 18.0K | |
| 26 | ● | Parker Waichman PARK DR 70 · 24.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 1.3% | 11.7% | 70 | 24.0K | |
| 27 | ● | Napoli Shkolnik NAPO DR 69 · 33.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 1.3% | 11.3% | 69 | 33.0K | |
| 28 | ● | Motley Rice MOTL DR 76 · 42.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 1.2% | 11.0% | 76 | 42.0K | |
| 29 | ● | Beasley Allen BEAS DR 74 · 36.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 1.2% | 10.7% | 74 | 36.0K | |
| 30 | ● | Baum Hedlund BAUM DR 71 · 19.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 1.1% | 10.3% | 71 | 19.0K | |
| 31 | ● | Goldberg Segalla GOLD DR 73 · 28.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 1.1% | 10.0% | 73 | 28.0K | |
| 32 | ● | Umar Lee Law UMAR DR 62 · 14.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 1.0% | 9.7% | 62 | 14.0K | |
| 33 | ● | Console & Associates CONS DR 67 · 26.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 1.0% | 9.3% | 67 | 26.0K | |
| 34 | ● | Davis Law Group DAVI DR 68 · 30.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 1.0% | 9.0% | 68 | 30.0K | |
| 35 | ● | Herrman & Herrman HERR DR 65 · 34.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 0.9% | 8.7% | 65 | 34.0K | |
| 36 | ● | Bighorn Law BIGH DR 63 · 41.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 0.9% | 8.3% | 63 | 41.0K | |
| 37 | ● | Fieger Law FIEG DR 70 · 23.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.9% | 8.0% | 70 | 23.0K | |
| 38 | ● | Kaine Law KAIN DR 64 · 21.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.8% | 7.7% | 64 | 21.0K | |
| 39 | ● | Wagoner Law Firm WAGO DR 60 · 12.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.8% | 7.3% | 60 | 12.0K | |
| 40 | ● | Brown & Crouppen BRCP DR 66 · 47.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 0.8% | 7.0% | 66 | 47.0K | |
| 41 | ● | Kisling, Nestico & Redick KNRL DR 67 · 39.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 0.8% | 6.7% | 67 | 39.0K | |
| 42 | ● | Gomez Law Firm GOME DR 65 · 26.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.7% | 6.3% | 65 | 26.0K | |
| 43 | ● | Lerner and Rowe LERN DR 68 · 130.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 0.7% | 6.0% | 68 | 130.0K | |
| 44 | ● | Daniel Kim Law DANK DR 64 · 55.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 0.7% | 5.7% | 64 | 55.0K | |
| 45 | ● | O’Connor & Partners OCON DR 61 · 16.0K organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.7% | 5.3% | 61 | 16.0K | |
| 46 | ● | My Rights Law MYRLClient DR 59 · 18.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.7% | 5.0% | 59 | 18.0K | |
| 47 | ● | Steinger, Greene & Feiner STEI DR 66 · 48.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 0.6% | 4.7% | 66 | 48.0K | |
| 48 | ● | Gary Martin Hays GARY DR 65 · 44.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.6% | 4.3% | 65 | 44.0K | |
| 49 | ● | Ken Nugent KENN DR 63 · 52.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 0.6% | 4.0% | 63 | 52.0K | |
| 50 | ● | Montlick & Associates MONT DR 64 · 46.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.6% | 3.7% | 64 | 46.0K | |
| 51 | ● | Farrar & Ball FARR DR 62 · 11.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.6% | 3.3% | 62 | 11.0K | |
| 52 | ● | Zehl & Associates ZEHL DR 67 · 22.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 0.5% | 3.0% | 67 | 22.0K | |
| 53 | ● | Abraham, Watkins ABRA DR 66 · 19.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.5% | 2.7% | 66 | 19.0K | |
| 54 | ● | The Krist Law Firm KRIS DR 64 · 15.0K organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.5% | 2.3% | 64 | 15.0K | |
| 55 | ● | Wisner Baum WISN DR 69 · 17.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.5% | 2.0% | 69 | 17.0K | |
| 56 | ● | Bottaro Law BOTT DR 61 · 13.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.5% | 1.7% | 61 | 13.0K | |
| 57 | ● | Marasco & Nesselbush MARA DR 60 · 12.0K organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.5% | 1.3% | 60 | 12.0K | |
| 58 | ● | Glen Lerner GLEN DR 62 · 35.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.4% | 1.0% | 62 | 35.0K | |
| 59 | ● | Richard Harris Law RICH DR 63 · 28.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.4% | 0.9% | 63 | 28.0K | |
| 60 | ● | Cage & Miles CAGE DR 58 · 9.0K organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.4% | 0.9% | 58 | 9.0K | |
| 61 | ● | Hupy and Abraham HUPY DR 65 · 33.0K organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 0.4% | 0.9% | 65 | 33.0K | |
| 62 | ● | Gruber Law GRUB DR 60 · 16.0K organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.4% | 0.8% | 60 | 16.0K | |
| 63 | ● | Pfeifer Morgan PFMR DR 59 · 8.0K organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.4% | 0.8% | 59 | 8.0K | |
| 64 | ● | Marks & Harrison MARK DR 62 · 21.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.4% | 0.8% | 62 | 21.0K | |
| 65 | ● | Allen & Allen ALLE DR 63 · 18.0K organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.3% | 0.7% | 63 | 18.0K | |
| 66 | ● | Friedman & Simon FRSM DR 58 · 10.0K organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.3% | 0.7% | 58 | 10.0K | |
| 67 | ● | Sobo & Sobo SOBO DR 57 · 11.0K organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.3% | 0.7% | 57 | 11.0K | |
| 68 | ● | Raphaelson & Levine RAPH DR 60 · 14.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.3% | 0.6% | 60 | 14.0K | |
| 69 | ● | Dansker & Aspromonte DANS DR 56 · 9.0K organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.3% | 0.6% | 56 | 9.0K | |
| 70 | ● | Greenstein & Pittari GRPT DR 55 · 8.0K organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.3% | 0.6% | 55 | 8.0K | |
| 71 | ● | Finz & Finz FINZ DR 61 · 12.0K organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.3% | 0.5% | 61 | 12.0K | |
| 72 | ● | Shaheen & Gordon SHAH DR 58 · 9.0K organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.3% | 0.5% | 58 | 9.0K | |
| 73 | ● | Berman & Simmons BRMN DR 60 · 10.0K organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.3% | 0.5% | 60 | 10.0K | |
| 74 | ● | Sugarman & Sugarman SUGA DR 59 · 7.0K organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 0.4% | 59 | 7.0K | |
| 75 | ● | Sweeney Merrigan SWEE DR 57 · 8.0K organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 0.4% | 57 | 8.0K | |
| 76 | ● | Breakstone White BREA DR 58 · 7.0K organic/mo · 1 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 0.4% | 58 | 7.0K | |
| 77 | ● | Powers & Santola POWR DR 60 · 8.0K organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 0.3% | 60 | 8.0K | |
| 78 | ● | Martin, Harding & Mazzotti MRTN DR 61 · 13.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 0.3% | 61 | 13.0K | |
| 79 | ● | Hardy Wolf & Downing HARD DR 55 · 5.0K organic/mo · 1 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 0.3% | 55 | 5.0K | |
| 80 | ● | Fales & Fales FALE DR 54 · 4.0K organic/mo · 1 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 0.3% | 54 | 4.0K | |
| 81 | ● | Sokolove Law SOKO DR 66 · 40.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 0.2% | 66 | 40.0K | |
| 82 | ● | Early Lucarelli EARL DR 58 · 6.0K organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 0.2% | 58 | 6.0K | |
| 83 | ● | Trantolo & Trantolo TRAN DR 57 · 9.0K organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 0.2% | 57 | 9.0K | |
| 84 | ● | Carter Mario CART DR 59 · 11.0K organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 0.2% | 59 | 11.0K | |
| 85 | ● | Gould Injury Law GULD DR 52 · 4.0K organic/mo · 1 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 0.2% | 52 | 4.0K | |
| 86 | ● | Lundy Law LUND DR 60 · 15.0K organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.1% | 0.2% | 60 | 15.0K | |
| 87 | ● | Kline & Specter KLIN DR 65 · 12.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.1% | 0.2% | 65 | 12.0K | |
| 88 | ● | Anapol Weiss ANAP DR 62 · 9.0K organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.1% | 0.1% | 62 | 9.0K | |
| 89 | ● | Feldman Shepherd FELD DR 61 · 7.0K organic/mo · 1 of 4 engines | 0.1% | 0.1% | 61 | 7.0K | |
| 90 | ● | Soloff & Zervanos SOLO DR 56 · 5.0K organic/mo · 1 of 4 engines | 0.1% | 0.1% | 56 | 5.0K | |
| 91 | ● | Edgar Snyder EDGA DR 60 · 19.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.1% | 0.1% | 60 | 19.0K | |
| 92 | ● | Chaffin Luhana CHAF DR 58 · 8.0K organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.1% | 0.1% | 58 | 8.0K | |
| 93 | ● | Berger and Green BRGR DR 57 · 7.0K organic/mo · 1 of 4 engines | 0.1% | 0.1% | 57 | 7.0K | |
| 94 | ● | Munley Law MUNL DR 59 · 10.0K organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.1% | 0.1% | 59 | 10.0K | |
| 95 | ● | Fellerman & Ciarimboli FELL DR 56 · 6.0K organic/mo · 1 of 4 engines | 0.1% | 0.1% | 56 | 6.0K | |
| 96 | ● | Metzger Wickersham METZ DR 55 · 5.0K organic/mo · 1 of 4 engines | 0.1% | 0.1% | 55 | 5.0K | |
| 97 | ● | Freeburn Law FREE DR 54 · 4.0K organic/mo · 1 of 4 engines | 0.1% | 0.1% | 54 | 4.0K | |
| 98 | ● | Shook & Stone SHOK DR 57 · 8.0K organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.1% | 0.1% | 57 | 8.0K | |
| 99 | ● | Benson & Bingham BENS DR 56 · 7.0K organic/mo · 1 of 4 engines | 0.1% | 0.1% | 56 | 7.0K | |
| 100 | ● | Naqvi Injury Law NAQV DR 55 · 9.0K organic/mo · 1 of 4 engines | 0.1% | 0.1% | 55 | 9.0K |
METHOD
How this is measured
Each edition tracks 300 questions spanning practice areas, injury types and location phrasings drawn from real search demand in this market. Every question is run against ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews during the measurement window, producing 1,200 AI-generated answers. Answers are parsed for firm mentions using a maintained entity table per firm covering names, d/b/a brands and domains. Share of voice is a firm's mentions divided by all tracked firm mentions. Appearance rate is the share of questions naming the firm at least once. Exact prompt strings are private to prevent firms optimizing for the test instead of the market; journalists can review the full methodology under NDA on request. Domain Rating by Ahrefs and monthly organic traffic from DataForSEO are shown as context and never used in the ranking.
Some eligible firms are clients of AEO Engine. Client relationships never affect measurement or rank, and every client firm is tagged on the board. The fastest way to test that claim is the methodology itself.
QUESTIONS
Frequently asked questions
What is the Answer Index?
A monthly editorial measurement of 100 eligible law firms. Each edition asks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews 300 real legal questions and measures which firms the 1,200 answers actually name.
How is a firm's rank decided?
Firms with positive share of voice are ranked by their mentions divided by all firm mentions. Ties break on appearance rate, then engine coverage. Firms with zero measured mentions are tied at 0.0% and unranked.
Can a firm pay to be ranked?
No. Rankings are never for sale, there are no sponsors, and AEO Engine clients are labeled wherever they appear and measured identically to every other firm.
Why is my firm not listed?
Each edition measures an eligible universe of 100 firms selected on the public criteria in the methodology. Firms outside the universe can request consideration for a future edition through the firm lookup.
How can a firm improve before the next edition?
AI assistants recommend firms with strong topical content, site authority and consistent third-party mentions. The next measurement window is shown at the top of this page. AEO Engine offers a detailed firm report covering the specific gaps.
Can we publish our ranking?
Yes. Every positive-score ranked firm gets a free badge, a social card with its rank and suggested announcement copy in the brag kit. Journalists get a press kit with verified stats and no email wall.
FOR RANKED FIRMS
Ranked this month?
Every positive-score ranked firm can use the badge below, free, linked to its row. The brag kit includes the badge in three formats, a social card with your rank, and suggested copy for your site and LinkedIn.
<a href="https://aeoengine.ai/answer-index/top-100-law-firms#firm-{TICKER}"><img src="https://aeoengine.ai/answer-index/badges/national-100-{TICKER}.png" alt="Ranked #{rank} on The Answer Index, National 100 · All Practice Areas" width="180"></a>Not ranked? Request your firm's score.
Press kit for this edition
The chart as an image, three verified stats, a 100-word summary and the embeddable top-10 widget. One click, no email wall for press assets.
September edition measurement runs September 1 to 3. Published September 5. What you fix in August gets counted.
Email me each edition
One email per edition. Press kit included. Unsubscribe anytime.