The Answer Index · Personal Injury · United States · October 2026
23 of 100 eligible personal injury firms received no measured mentions.
We asked ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews 300 real personal injury questions. 1,200 answers, measured monthly. These are AI visibility results for 100 eligible personal injury firms.
Rankings are never for sale. Client firms are always disclosed. Corrections within 48 hours.
Is your firm on the list?
Get your firm's full report free. The 300 answers, your share of voice, and the three fastest fixes.
It is the same measurement our clients pay for every month. Yours is free.
23 of the 100 eligible firms received no measured mentions this edition.
The top 10 firms take 55.6% of every AI mention. The other 90 eligible firms split 44.4%.
Only 29 of 100 eligible firms appear in all four engines. 11 firms appear in a single engine.
Morgan & Morgan appears in 74.7% of tracked questions, 46 points clear of Wilshire Law Firm.
The editorial surprise pick lands with the November 2026 edition.
The Ranking
Top 10 this edition
- 1Morgan & Morgan21.3%74.7%
●
- 2Wilshire Law Firm5.1%28.7%
▲ 3
- 3Dolman Law Group4.3%25.3%
▲ 10
- 4Thomas J. Henry Law4.2%25.7%
●
- 5Sokolove Law4.2%22.7%
▲ 1
- 6Panish Shea Ravipudi3.8%19.7%
▲ 1
- 7The Barnes Firm3.7%20.3%
▼ 5
- 8Beasley Allen3.5%19.7%
●
- 9Parker Waichman2.8%17.0%
▲ 6
- 10Kline & Specter2.7%18.0%
▲ 4
Movement
Movers since the prior edition
Rank movement is counted in whole board positions. Share of voice movement is counted in percentage points. They are different measurements and are reported separately.
The eligible universe is unchanged from the prior edition.
No firm left the eligible universe.
Measured in the October 2026 window and unranked. This cohort is measured directly and does not depend on a prior edition.
Complete Data
Full board, 100 eligible firms
AI share of voice: this firm's share of every firm mention across all 1,200 answers. Appearance rate: the share of 300 tracked questions where this firm shows up at least once.
| Firm | Engines | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ● | Morgan & Morgan MRGN DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 21.3% | 74.7% | - | - | |
| 2 | ▲ 3 | Wilshire Law Firm WILS DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 5.1% | 28.7% | - | - | |
| 3 | ▲ 10 | Dolman Law Group DOLA DR - · - organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 4.3% | 25.3% | - | - | |
| 4 | ● | Thomas J. Henry Law TJHL DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 4.2% | 25.7% | - | - | |
| 5 | ▲ 1 | Sokolove Law SOKO DR - · - organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 4.2% | 22.7% | - | - | |
| 6 | ▲ 1 | Panish Shea Ravipudi PANR DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 3.8% | 19.7% | - | - | |
| 7 | ▼ 5 | The Barnes Firm BRNS DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 3.7% | 20.3% | - | - | |
| 8 | ● | Beasley Allen BEAS DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 3.5% | 19.7% | - | - | |
| 9 | ▲ 6 | Parker Waichman PARK DR - · - organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 2.8% | 17.0% | - | - | |
| 10 | ▲ 4 | Kline & Specter KLIN DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 2.7% | 18.0% | - | - | |
| 11 | ▲ 9 | Weitz & Luxenberg WEIT DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 2.6% | 16.7% | - | - | |
| 12 | ▼ 1 | Arnold & Itkin ARNL DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 2.6% | 15.3% | - | - | |
| 13 | ▼ 10 | Gair, Gair, Conason GAIR DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 2.5% | 13.3% | - | - | |
| 14 | ▲ 9 | Clifford Law Offices CLIO DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 2.3% | 13.3% | - | - | |
| 15 | ▼ 3 | Zehl & Associates ZEHL DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 2.1% | 10.7% | - | - | |
| 16 | ▲ 11 | Jacoby & Meyers JACO DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 2.0% | 12.7% | - | - | |
| 17 | ▼ 7 | The Lanier Law Firm THEN DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 1.8% | 11.3% | - | - | |
| 18 | ▲ 13 | Pintas & Mullins PINT DR - · - organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 1.8% | 9.7% | - | - | |
| 19 | ▲ 9 | Levin & Perconti LEVE DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 1.7% | 11.0% | - | - | |
| 20 | ▼ 11 | Cellino Law CELL DR - · - organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 1.7% | 11.3% | - | - | |
| 21 | ▲ 5 | Motley Rice MOTL DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 1.2% | 4.7% | - | - | |
| 22 | ▲ 7 | Levin Papantonio LEVP DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 1.2% | 9.0% | - | - | |
| 23 | ▼ 7 | The Dominguez Firm THEO DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 1.2% | 6.7% | - | - | |
| 24 | ▼ 7 | Farah & Farah FARH DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 0.9% | 5.0% | - | - | |
| 25 | ▼ 4 | Lerner and Rowe LERN DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 0.8% | 5.3% | - | - | |
| 26 | ▼ 1 | Lieff Cabraser LIEC DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 0.8% | 3.0% | - | - | |
| 27 | ▲ 16 | Herrman & Herrman HERR DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 0.8% | 5.3% | - | - | |
| 28 | ▼ 9 | Salvi, Schostok & Pritchard SALV DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 0.7% | 3.7% | - | - | |
| 29 | ▲ 8 | Finz & Finz FINZ DR - · - organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.7% | 5.0% | - | - | |
| 30 | ▲ 2 | Steinger, Greene & Feiner STEI DR - · - organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.7% | 5.0% | - | - | |
| 31 | ▼ 13 | John Foy & Associates JOHF DR - · - organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.7% | 4.7% | - | - | |
| 32 | ▲ 14 | Alexander Shunnarah SHUN DR - · - organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.7% | 4.7% | - | - | |
| 33 | ▲ 3 | Brown & Crouppen BRCP DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 0.7% | 4.3% | - | - | |
| 34 | ▼ 1 | Sweet James SWJM DR - · - organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.6% | 4.3% | - | - | |
| 35 | ● | Saltz Mongeluzzi Bendesky SALZ DR - · - organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.6% | 4.0% | - | - | |
| 36 | ▲ 18 | Wisner Baum WISN DR - · - organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.6% | 4.0% | - | - | |
| 37 | ▼ 7 | Block O'Toole & Murphy BLOK DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 0.6% | 3.7% | - | - | |
| 38 | ▼ 16 | Simmons Hanly Conroy SIMM DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 0.6% | 3.7% | - | - | |
| 39 | ● | Montlick & Associates MONT DR - · - organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.5% | 3.7% | - | - | |
| 40 | ▲ 33 | Goldberg Segalla GOLD DR - · - organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.5% | 3.3% | - | - | |
| 41 | ▼ 7 | Raphaelson & Levine RAPH DR - · - organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.5% | 3.7% | - | - | |
| 42 | ▲ 2 | Edgar Snyder & Associates EDGR DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 0.5% | 1.7% | - | - | |
| 43 | ▼ 2 | Corboy & Demetrio CORO DR - · - organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.4% | 2.7% | - | - | |
| 44 | ▲ 1 | Monge & Associates MONE DR - · - organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.4% | 2.7% | - | - | |
| 45 | ▲ 4 | Keller & Keller KELL DR - · - organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.4% | 2.7% | - | - | |
| 46 | ▲ 21 | The Carlson Law Firm THEA DR - · - organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.4% | 2.7% | - | - | |
| 47 | ▼ 23 | GJEL Accident Attorneys GJEA DR - · - organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.4% | 2.3% | - | - | |
| 48 | ▼ 10 | Davis Saperstein Salomon DAVS DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 0.3% | 2.7% | - | - | |
| 49 | ▲ 7 | Baron & Budd BARN DR - · - organic/mo · 4 of 4 engines | 0.3% | 2.3% | - | - | |
| 50 | ▼ 10 | Ross Feller Casey ROSF DR - · - organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.3% | 2.3% | - | - | |
| 51 | ▼ 3 | Terry Bryant TERY DR - · - organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 2.0% | - | - | |
| 52 | ● | Abraham, Watkins ABRA DR - · - organic/mo · 3 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 1.7% | - | - | |
| 53 | ▼ 11 | Robins Kaplan ROBN DR - · - organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 1.7% | - | - | |
| 54 | ▲ 3 | Adamson Ahdoot ADAS DR - · - organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 1.7% | - | - | |
| 55 | ▼ 2 | Ask4SAM ASK4Client DR - · - organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 1.7% | - | - | |
| 56 | ▼ 9 | Belluck & Fox BELU DR - · - organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 1.7% | - | - | |
| 57 | n/a | Rheingold Giuffra Ruffo Plotkin RHEN DR - · - organic/mo · 1 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 1.7% | - | - | |
| 58 | ▼ 8 | Gary Martin Hays GARY DR - · - organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 1.3% | - | - | |
| 59 | ▼ 8 | Anapol Weiss ANAP DR - · - organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 1.0% | - | - | |
| 60 | ▲ 4 | Feldman Shepherd FELD DR - · - organic/mo · 1 of 4 engines | 0.1% | 1.0% | - | - | |
| 61 | ▲ 7 | Craig Swapp & Associates CRAG DR - · - organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.1% | 0.7% | - | - | |
| 62 | ▼ 7 | Rosenbaum & Associates ROSN DR - · - organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.1% | 0.7% | - | - | |
| 63 | ▲ 2 | Arash Law ARAH DR - · - organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 0.7% | - | - | |
| 64 | ▲ 5 | Stewart J Guss STEA DR - · - organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 0.7% | - | - | |
| 65 | ▲ 7 | Fielding Law FIED DR - · - organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 0.7% | - | - | |
| 66 | ▼ 3 | The Krist Law Firm KRIS DR - · - organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 0.7% | - | - | |
| 67 | ▼ 6 | Napoli Shkolnik NAPO DR - · - organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 0.7% | - | - | |
| 68 | ▲ 7 | Soloff & Zervanos SOLO DR - · - organic/mo · 2 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 0.7% | - | - | |
| 69 | ▼ 10 | Cohen & Jaffe COHN DR - · - organic/mo · 1 of 4 engines | 0.2% | 0.7% | - | - | |
| 70 | n/a | Ken Nugent KENN DR - · - organic/mo · 1 of 4 engines | 0.1% | 0.3% | - | - | |
| 71 | n/a | Berg Injury Lawyers BERI DR - · - organic/mo · 1 of 4 engines | 0.1% | 0.3% | - | - | |
| 72 | n/a | Bighorn Law BIGH DR - · - organic/mo · 1 of 4 engines | 0.1% | 0.3% | - | - | |
| 73 | ▼ 13 | Early Lucarelli EARL DR - · - organic/mo · 1 of 4 engines | 0.1% | 0.3% | - | - | |
| 74 | ● | Hagens Berman HAGE DR - · - organic/mo · 1 of 4 engines | 0.1% | 0.3% | - | - | |
| 75 | ▲ 1 | Daniel Kim Law DANK DR - · - organic/mo · 1 of 4 engines | 0.1% | 0.3% | - | - | |
| 76 | ▼ 18 | Wingate Russotti Shapiro WINA DR - · - organic/mo · 1 of 4 engines | 0.1% | 0.3% | - | - | |
| 77 | n/a | Waters Kraus Paul WATR DR - · - organic/mo · 1 of 4 engines | 0.1% | 0.3% | - | - |
Tied at 0.0%: unranked
These 23 eligible firms received no measured mentions in this edition. They are listed alphabetically and do not receive ordinal ranks.
| Status | Change | Firm | AI share of voice | Appearance rate | Engines | DR | Est. organic/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unranked | Not applicable | Baum Hedlund BAUM DR - · - organic/mo · 0 of 4 engines | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | |
| Unranked | Not applicable | Bernstein Liebhard BERN DR - · - organic/mo · 0 of 4 engines | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | |
| Unranked | Not applicable | Bramnick Rodriguez Grabas BRAN DR - · - organic/mo · 0 of 4 engines | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | |
| Unranked | Not applicable | Butler Wooten Peak BUTE DR - · - organic/mo · 0 of 4 engines | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | |
| Unranked | Not applicable | Cesar Ornelas Law CESR DR - · - organic/mo · 0 of 4 engines | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | |
| Unranked | Not applicable | Cunningham Bounds CUNI DR - · - organic/mo · 0 of 4 engines | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | |
| Unranked | Not applicable | Dansker & Aspromonte DANS DR - · - organic/mo · 0 of 4 engines | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | |
| Unranked | Not applicable | Fadduol Cluff Hardy Conaway FADU DR - · - organic/mo · 0 of 4 engines | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | |
| Unranked | Not applicable | Girardi Keese GIRR DR - · - organic/mo · 0 of 4 engines | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | |
| Unranked | Not applicable | Glen Lerner GLEN DR - · - organic/mo · 0 of 4 engines | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | |
| Unranked | Not applicable | Greenstein & Pittari GRPT DR - · - organic/mo · 0 of 4 engines | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | |
| Unranked | Not applicable | Hach & Rose HACR DR - · - organic/mo · 0 of 4 engines | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | |
| Unranked | Not applicable | Hilliard Martinez Gonzales HILI DR - · - organic/mo · 0 of 4 engines | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | |
| Unranked | Not applicable | Kaster Lynch Farrar & Ball KASE DR - · - organic/mo · 0 of 4 engines | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | |
| Unranked | Not applicable | Kazan Law KAZN DR - · - organic/mo · 0 of 4 engines | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | |
| Unranked | Not applicable | Labaton Keller Sucharow LABA DR - · - organic/mo · 0 of 4 engines | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | |
| Unranked | Not applicable | Levinson Axelrod LEVS DR - · - organic/mo · 0 of 4 engines | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | |
| Unranked | Not applicable | Levy Konigsberg LEVK DR - · - organic/mo · 0 of 4 engines | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | |
| Unranked | Not applicable | Lipsig Shapey Manus Moverman LIPI DR - · - organic/mo · 0 of 4 engines | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | |
| Unranked | Not applicable | Mike Hostilo Law Firm MIKH DR - · - organic/mo · 0 of 4 engines | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | |
| Unranked | Not applicable | My Rights Law MYRLClient DR - · - organic/mo · 0 of 4 engines | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | |
| Unranked | Not applicable | Robbins Geller ROBB DR - · - organic/mo · 0 of 4 engines | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | |
| Unranked | Not applicable | Robert J DeBry ROBR DR - · - organic/mo · 0 of 4 engines | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - |
METHOD
How this is measured
Each edition tracks 300 questions spanning injury types, case scenarios and location phrasings drawn from real search demand in the personal injury market. Every question is run against ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews during the measurement window, producing 1,200 AI-generated answers. Answers are parsed for firm mentions using a maintained entity table per firm covering names, d/b/a brands and domains. Share of voice is a firm's mentions divided by all tracked firm mentions. Appearance rate is the share of questions naming the firm at least once. Exact prompt strings are private to prevent firms optimizing for the test instead of the market; journalists can review the full methodology under NDA on request. Domain Rating by Ahrefs and monthly organic traffic from DataForSEO are shown as context and never used in the ranking.
Some eligible firms are clients of AEO Engine. Client relationships never affect measurement or rank, and every client firm is tagged on the board. The fastest way to test that claim is the methodology itself.
QUESTIONS
Frequently asked questions
What is the Answer Index?
A monthly editorial measurement of 100 eligible personal injury law firms. Each edition asks four AI engines 300 real questions and measures which firms the 1,200 answers actually name.
How is a firm's rank decided?
Firms with positive share of voice are ranked by their mentions divided by all firm mentions. Ties break on appearance rate, then engine coverage. Firms with zero measured mentions are tied at 0.0% and unranked.
Can a firm pay to be ranked?
No. Rankings are never for sale, there are no sponsors, and AEO Engine clients are labeled wherever they appear and measured identically to every other firm.
Why is my firm not listed?
Each edition measures an eligible universe of 100 firms selected on the public criteria in the methodology. Firms outside the universe can request consideration for a future edition through the firm lookup.
How can a firm improve before the next edition?
AI assistants recommend firms with strong topical content, site authority and consistent third-party mentions. The next measurement window is shown at the top of this page. AEO Engine offers a detailed firm report covering the specific gaps.
Can we publish our ranking?
Yes. Every positive-score ranked firm gets a free badge, a social card with its rank and suggested announcement copy in the brag kit. Journalists get a press kit with verified stats and no email wall.
FOR RANKED FIRMS
Ranked this month?
Every positive-score ranked firm can use the badge below, free, linked to its row. The brag kit includes the badge in three formats, a social card with your rank, and suggested copy for your site and LinkedIn.
<a href="https://aeoengine.ai/answer-index/personal-injury-law-firms#firm-{TICKER}"><img src="https://aeoengine.ai/answer-index/badges/personal-injury-100-{TICKER}.png" alt="Ranked #{rank} on The Answer Index, Personal Injury · United States" width="180"></a>Not ranked? Request your firm's score.
Press kit for this edition
The chart as an image, three verified stats, a 100-word summary and the embeddable top-10 widget. One click, no email wall for press assets.
November 2026 edition measurement runs November 1 to 3. Published November 5. What you fix in October gets counted.
Email me each edition
One email per edition. Press kit included. Unsubscribe anytime.